India Bans Transshipment Facility for Bangladesh after Chinese Puppet Yunus’s illogical remarks

image 45

India Bans Transshipment Facility for Bangladesh after Chinese Puppet Yunus’s illogical remarks

India

Northeast India was, is, and will always be an integral part of Bharat. In a move that has sent ripples through South Asian geopolitics, India has abruptly ended a key transshipment facility that allowed Bangladesh to route its export cargo through Indian territory to third countries. The decision, effective immediately as of April 8, comes days after Muhammad Yunus, the chief adviser of Bangladesh’s interim government, made controversial remarks during a visit to China, suggesting that Bangladesh could serve as a maritime gateway for India’s “landlocked” Northeast, potentially extending Chinese economic influence into this strategically sensitive region.

The termination of this facility, which had facilitated Bangladesh’s trade with Bhutan, Nepal, and Myanmar since 2020, marks a significant escalation in the already strained relations between New Delhi and Dhaka, raising questions about regional stability and Bharat’s response to an emboldened Chinese presence in its backyard.

The Backdrop: Yunus’s China Visit and the Northeast Remark

The spark for this diplomatic flare-up ignited during Yunus’ four-day visit to China from March 26-29, where he met with President Xi Jinping and signed nine agreements aimed at deepening Sino-Bangladeshi ties. Speaking at a high-level roundtable in Beijing, Yunus described India’s northeastern states—often referred to as the “Seven Sisters”—as a “landlocked region” with “no way to reach out to the ocean.”

He positioned Bangladesh as the “only guardian of the ocean” for this area, suggesting it could become “an extension of the Chinese economy” by producing goods, marketing them, and connecting them to global trade routes via Bangladesh’s ports. “This opens up a huge possibility,” Yunus said, framing Dhaka as a critical conduit for Beijing’s economic ambitions in South Asia.

India

The remarks, widely circulated via videos shared by Bangladesh’s interim government on social media, triggered immediate backlash in India. Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma labeled them “offensive” and “strongly condemnable,” arguing that they underscored the vulnerability of India’s Siliguri Corridor, colloquially known as the “Chicken’s Neck”—a narrow 22-kilometer strip of land connecting the Northeast to the rest of the country. Sarma called for alternative infrastructure to bolster connectivity, while other Indian leaders, including Congress’s Pawan Khera, accused Yunus of inviting China to “encircle India,” pointing to Beijing’s existing claims on Arunachal Pradesh and its infrastructure buildup along the Line of Actual Control.

India’s Response: A Strategic Retaliation

India’s decision to rescind the transshipment facility, formalized through a circular from the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) on April 8, appears to be a calculated retaliation. The facility, introduced in June 2020, allowed Bangladeshi export cargo to move through Indian Land Customs Stations (LCSs) to ports and airports, streamlining trade with Bhutan, Nepal, and Myanmar. Its termination, though framed by the Ministry of External Affairs as a logistical necessity due to “congestion at our airports and ports,” is widely interpreted as a signal to Dhaka—and Beijing—that New Delhi will not tolerate moves that threaten its strategic interests.

The Ministry clarified that the withdrawal does not affect Bangladesh’s exports to Nepal or Bhutan transiting through India, but trade experts warn that the broader impact could be significant. “This streamlined route cut transit time and costs,” said Ajay Srivastava, founder of the Global Trade Research Initiative. “Now, Bangladeshi exporters may face delays, higher expenses, and uncertainty.” Sectors like apparel, footwear, and gems—where Bangladesh competes fiercely with Bharat—could feel the pinch, potentially benefiting Indian exporters who have long complained about capacity constraints caused by Bangladeshi cargo.

The Geopolitical Chessboard: China’s Growing Shadow

At the heart of this spat lies the specter of China’s expanding influence in South Asia. Yunus’ pitch to Beijing wasn’t just rhetoric—it came with concrete proposals. During his visit, China pledged $400 million for Mongla Port, $350 million for the Chinese Economic and Industrial Zone in Chattogram, and $150 million in technical assistance. Reports also suggest Bangladesh has invited Chinese investment to upgrade an airbase in Lalmonirhat, near the Siliguri Corridor—a move that has heightened India’s security concerns. With Beijing already asserting claims over Arunachal Pradesh and building dams on the Brahmaputra River, the prospect of Chinese economic and military footholds in Bangladesh is a red line for New Delhi.

India

India’s Northeast, comprising eight states, is a geopolitical flashpoint. Connected to the mainland only through the Chicken’s Neck, it shares borders with Bangladesh, China, Myanmar, Bhutan, and Nepal. Any disruption here—whether logistical, economic, or military—could destabilize India’s eastern flank. Yunus’s remarks, intentional or not, tapped into this vulnerability, amplifying fears of encirclement at a time when India-Bangladesh relations are already fragile following the ouster of Sheikh Hasina’s government in August 2024.

Domestic and Regional Reactions

In India, the decision has drawn mixed responses. While some hail it as a decisive stand against Bangladesh’s pivot to China, others question its long-term wisdom. Trade analysts note that the move could strain India’s commitments under the World Trade Organization’s Trade Facilitation Agreement, which mandates efficient transit for landlocked countries—a category that includes Nepal and Bhutan, both reliant on Indian routes. “This could invite diplomatic pushback,” warned one expert, speaking anonymously.

In Bangladesh, the reaction has been muted, with Yunus’ interim government yet to comment officially. However, the economic stakes are high. With the country grappling with financial woes post-Hasina, Chinese investment is a lifeline Yunus cannot afford to lose. Yet, by antagonizing India—a neighbor that has historically offered zero-tariff access to Bangladeshi goods—Dhaka risks overplaying its hand.

A Fragile Balance: What Lies Ahead?

The termination of the transshipment facility is more than a trade dispute—it’s a chapter in the broader saga of South Asian power dynamics. For India, it’s a reminder of the challenges posed by a resurgent China and an unpredictable Bangladesh. For Yunus, it’s a test of his interim government’s ability to navigate a delicate balancing act between economic survival and regional diplomacy.

India

Critics argue that India’s response, while assertive, may push Bangladesh further into China’s orbit, undoing decades of goodwill built under Hasina’s tenure. Others see it as a necessary flex of muscle, signaling that New Delhi will not cede its strategic backyard without a fight. Meanwhile, the Northeast remains a tinderbox—its isolation both a liability and a rallying point for India’s security establishment.

As the dust settles, all eyes are on the upcoming BIMSTEC summit in Thailand, where Yunus has requested a meeting with Prime Minister Narendra Modi. India has yet to confirm, leaving the prospect of dialogue uncertain. For now, the transshipment rollback stands as a bold marker of intent—one that could reshape alliances and rivalries in a region already teetering on the edge of transformation.

image 45

Hindu genocide is going on in USA-backed Yunus’s Bangladesh, but the world has time only for Palestine

image 48

Hindu genocide is going on in USA-backed Yunus’s Bangladesh, but the world has time only for Palestine

bangladeshi hindu

Hindu minorities are consistently facing attacks from Muslim radicals in Islamic Bangladesh and Pakistan. 2200 attacks took place on minorities, especially Hindus from Pakistan and Bangladesh, which exposed the propaganda of Yunus, Chief Advisor of the Interim Government of Bangladesh.

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Bharat’s Minister of State for External Affairs, Kirtivardhan Singh, said in the Parliament that till December 8, 2024, 2200 attacks had taken place against minorities (especially Hindus), including tribals in Bangladesh, while till October this year, 112 incidents of attacks have been reported in Pakistan.

Since the resignation of former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina in Bangladesh because of the USA’s deep state planned student protest, which tarnished the image of the country, there has been harsh violence against Bangladeshi Hindus, but the followers of interim government chief Yunus and the chief himself are not ready to accept the reality. Now the Bharatiya government has revealed the violence in the lies of Bangladesh.

In a reply given in Parliament, Minister of State for External Affairs Kirtivardhan Singh said that till December 8, 2024, there have been 2200 attacks against minorities, especially Hindus, in Bangladesh, while since October this year, 112 incidents of violence have been reported in Pakistan. Or it is clear from this that the demons of Bangladeshi friendship are also coming out on a large scale against Pakistan.

ALSO READ: Rahul Gandhi’s tension increased as Bharat’s ruling political party BJP’s female MP made serious allegations

Minister of State for External Affairs Kirtivardhan Singh told in the data released in Parliament that while 47 attacks were reported against students and other minorities in Bangladesh in the year 2022, this number was 241 in Pakistan. After this, in 2021, 302 cases were reported in Bangladesh and 103 in Pakistan. At the same time, violence against tribals is in full swing in Bangladesh this year. Till December 8, 2024, 2200 cases of violence were reported in Bangladesh, and this number is 112 in Pakistan.

bangladeshi hindu

The Minister of State for External Affairs said that the government has selected these incidents of violence, and such incidents have come to the notice of the Bangladesh government. The government expects the Bangladesh government to take strict and necessary steps to protect the tribals and other minorities. The same message was given during the visit of the Secretary of Foreign Affairs to Bangladesh. The Bharatiya Embassy in the capital, Dhaka, has also been closely watching the incidents of attacks.

Along with this, the Minister of State for External Affairs also said that the Government of Bharat has urged Pakistan to take steps to stop religious discrimination, communal violence, systemic violence, and suppression of the minority community and ensure their safety, protection, and welfare. “Bharat continues to engage with minorities in Pakistan at international forums,” the minister said.

The minister said that cases of violence against tribals and other minorities in other neighbouring countries (excluding Pakistan and Bangladesh) are zero. He was asked about the total number of cases of violence against Hindus and other minorities in neighbouring countries during the last three years, country-wise and year-wise; steps taken or suggested by the ministry for the protection of minorities, including national emergency and relief actions.

Zero cases of violence, excluding Bangladesh and Pakistan

He further said that Bharat has been consistently highlighting the plight of minorities in Pakistan at appropriate international forums. Cases of violence against Hindus and other minorities in other neighbouring countries (except Pakistan and Bangladesh) are ‘zero’.

bangladeshi hindu

Keeping a close watch: Minister

The minister said Bharat is closely watching the situation relating to minorities in Bangladesh. The country has conveyed Bharat’s concerns about the need to ensure the safety of Hindus and all other minority communities. He informed me that the Bharatiya government has repeatedly appealed to the country’s government to ensure the safety of Hindus and other minorities. He said that the Bangladesh government had deployed an army and border guards to enhance security after attacks during Durga Puja.

Hey world, Raise your voice and provide every type of help to Bangladeshi and Pakistani Hindus like you did for Palestinians.

‘Let us come to India’ Thousands of Bangladeshi Hindus standing in water and arguing with BSF, chanting Jai Shri Ram

image 66
Bangladeshi

Bangladeshis on Indian Border Thousands of Bangladeshi Hindus are close to the border in Sitalkuchi, Cooch Behar, Bengal, in the midst of turmoil in Bangladesh. These individuals asked the BSF to allow them a chance to enter India. In any case, the BSF is completely centered around border security. Individuals from Bangladesh have been coming to the North 24 Parganas of Bengal for the last few days.

HighLights


Thousands of Bangladeshi Hindus show up in Sitalkuchi, Cooch Behar, and BengalThe BSF work force has halted these individuals a short distance from the border.
The government formed a committee to keep an eye on the border.

Bangladeshi

Digital Work Area, Unused Delhi. Indeed, in spite of the fact that a modern government has been shaped in Bangladesh, viciousness is still going on there. Nonconformists are focusing on the minority community. Numerous Hindu families from Bangladesh (Bangladeshis on the Indian Border) need to take off their homes and come to India.

Thousands of Hindu community members are displayed on the India-Bangladesh border. In Sitalkuchi, Cooch Behar, Bengal, almost 1000 Bangladeshis are standing in the store and asking the BSF to permit them to enter India.

People yell trademarks of ‘Jai Shri Ram’

However, the BSF is too alarming with respect to border security. BSF authorities said that this is the largest group of individualsattempting to enter India so far.

People attempting to cross the border in Pathantuli town of Kashiyar Baruni zone of ​​​​Cooch Behar were so frantic that they held up for hours in the storeover the fence. A fewindividuals were yelling the trademarks of ‘Jai Shri Ram’ and ‘Bharat Mata Ki Jai’.

Bangladeshi

BSF on alert

BSF staffhalted these individuals from crossing the fence at a distance of 150 yards from the zero point (no man’s arrive) of the border. In spite of rehashed offers by BSF jawans, these individuals were not prepared to return to their homes in Doi Khawa and Genduguri towns of Rangpur locale of Bangladesh.

ALSO READ: Susan Wojcicki, the previous YouTube CEO, passes away at 56.

A BSF discharge said, “This developing challenge is unused for the BSF. Individuals from Bangladesh have been coming to Petrapole in North 24 Parganas of Bengal for the final few days.

committee shaped for border security

Let us tell you that the government has formed a committee to keep an eye on the border. The ADG of the Eastern Command of the Border Security Drive has been made chairman of the committee. Prior, the Border Security Drive had expanded carefulness on the Bangladesh border. Let us tell you that the occurrences of savagery in Bangladesh have expanded the concern of the Government of India.

Bangladesh Crisis 2024: Sheikh Hasina Faces Mounting Challenges

image 28
Bangladesh Crisis

In later months, the Bangladesh Crisis has found itself involved in a multifaceted emergency that debilitates its political solidity, financial development, and social cohesion. At the center of this turmoil is Prime Minister Sheik Hasina, whose authority is being tried like never before.

Political Turmoil

The political scene in the Bangladesh crisis has been progressively unstable. Pressures between the administering Awami Alliance, driven by Sheik Hasina, and the resistance Bangladesh Crisis Patriot Party (BNP) have led to road dissent and savage clashes. The BNP, along with other resistance parties, accuses the government of dictatorship and race fixing, requesting free and reasonable elections.

The government’s reaction to these dissents has been extreme. Police crackdowns, mass captures, and the utilize of over the top constrain have been broadly detailed, drawing feedback from human rights organizations. The restriction claims that these activities are pointed at hushing contradict and uniting control ahead of the another common election.

Financial Struggles

Parallel to the political distress, the Bangladesh crisis is grappling with critical financial challenges. The COVID-19 outbreak had a significant affect on the country’s economy, which depends intensely on the clothing industry and settlements from abroad. In spite of a vigorous recovery in 2022, the worldwide financial lull and rising swelling have posed modern threats.

Also read: Bayern Munich vs. Tottenham: An Epic Showdown

The World Bank and the Universal Money related Support (IMF) have both downsized their development estimates for Bangladesh. Swelling, driven by rising worldwide product costs, has disintegrated acquiring control and driven to broad discontent. The fetched of basic merchandise, such as nourishment and fuel, has taken off, putting monstrous weight on standard citizens.

To moderate these financial challenges, the government has presented a few measures, including appropriations and social security nets. Be that as it may, faultfinders contend that these measures are inadequate and that more comprehensive auxiliary changes are required to guarantee maintainable growth.

Bangladesh Crisis

Social Issues

Social issues have too come to the cutting edge, exacerbated by the progressing emergency. The Bangladesh Crisis has made critical advances in destitution lessening and human advancement over the past decade. Be that as it may, the widespread economy has switched a few of these picks up, pushing millions back into poverty.

Education and healthcare frameworks are beneath strain. School closures amid the widespread disturbed instruction for millions of children, especially in rustic regions where online learning was not attainable. The healthcare framework, as of now delicate, has battled to adapt with the requests of the widespread, uncovering long-standing deficiencies.

Additionally, the Rohingya displaced person emergency proceeds to be a noteworthy burden. The Bangladesh Crisis has over a million Rohingya displaced people who fled abuse in Myanmar. The worldwide community’s back has melted away, clearing out Bangladesh to bear much of the obligation. The outcasts live in stuffed camps with constrained access to to essential administrations, making a compassionate emergency that appears to have no signs of resolution.

Sheik Hasina’s Leadership

Sheikh Hasina, who has been in control since 2009, is confronting one of the most challenging periods of her residency. Known for her strong-willed administration and financial changes that have changed Bangladesh, Hasina presently finds herself in a dubious position.

Her organization has been lauded for its foundation ventures, financial changes, and endeavors to make strides women’s rights. Be that as it may, her approach to political contradict and media flexibility has been broadly criticized. The Advanced Security Act, which has been utilized to capture writers and smother free discourse, has drawn universal condemnation.

Hasina’s government has, moreover, been denounced of cronyism and debasement. Affirmations of favouritism and abuse of open stores have discolored her administration’s picture, undermining open trust.

Bangladesh Crisis

Worldwide Relations

On a worldwide scale, Bangladesh Crisis outside relations are also being tried. The country’s vital area and developing economy have made it a central point for territorial and worldwide powers. Relations with neighboring India stay solid, but there are pressures over water-sharing understandings and border issues.

China has expanded its impact on the Bangladesh crisis through ventures and framework ventures, which has raised concerns in modern Delhi and Washington. The joined-together States have communicated concerns about human rights management and the state of vote based system in Bangladesh, which encourages complicating the conciliatory landscape.

The Street Ahead

As Bangladesh Crisis navigates these turbulent times, the role of Sheik Hasina will be significant in deciding the country’s future. Adjusting financial recuperation, political soundness, and social cohesion will require adroit authority and comprehensive governance.

For numerous Bangladeshis, the trust lies in a future where financial openings are open, political flexibilities are respected, and social equity wins. The way forward will not be simple, but with flexibility and assurance, Bangladesh can overcome its current emergency and proceed on its journey of advance and advancement.