Dinesh Yadav: An officer with 200000 numbers, two fake Instagram IDs, and 300 hours of CCTV
Vishal, who killed Rajendra Gupta and 4 members of his family three months ago in Varanasi, has been arrested. Along with this, the second accused, Vishal’s brother Prashant, has also been arrested by the police. The arrest of both has been possible only because of Dinesh Yadav, surveillance in-charge of Varanasi Commissionerate.
Varanasi in Uttar Pradesh was shaken by the murder of five members of the same family in November 2024. The police have arrested the murderer Vishal Gupta, alias Vicky, and his brother Prashant, alias Jugnu. The police had announced a reward of one lakh rupees for the absconding accused. After dodging the police for three months, now finally both the accused have been arrested. Both the brothers were standing and talking near the Lautubir temple of Sirgovardhan. The police caught them.
Policeman Dinesh Yadav played a key role in solving this case. The Varanasi Police Commissionerate was about to hand over the case to the STF when surveillance in-charge Inspector Dinesh Yadav got a breakthrough. That breakthrough was that Prashant alias Jugnu’s mobile was chatting through the Instagram app with two fake names, Vaishali and Vikas. From here, the police investigation proceeded, and finally, Vishal, alias Vicky, came under the police’s custody.
Varanasi Commissionerate’s surveillance in-charge Dinesh Yadav said that it was a tough task. Vicky himself was an app developer and had not even used the mobile for the last six months. Dinesh Yadav said that then he started searching Prashant’s alias Jugnu’s mobile. This breakthrough came after searching about two lakh numbers and 300 hours of CCTV from March 2022 to three numbers in 2024.
Used to talk on Instagram
Vishal and Prashant used to stay in touch with each other through the Instagram app. Where to come to get the money or from whom to take legal advice in this matter, he used to discuss on the app itself. DCP Gaurav Banshwal said that on the day of the incident, Vicky stayed on the BHU campus. The police have also got CCTV footage of him roaming on the BHU campus. From BHU itself, he reached Mirapur in Romania, where he killed Rajendra. After that, he booked Ola from a delivery boy’s mobile and reached Cantt station and then reached Bhadaini by auto, where he killed four more people.
Vicky did not stay in hotels
Surveillance in-charge Dinesh Yadav told Tv9 Bharatvarsh that he kept running from one railway station to another with the help of a sheet and some clothes. Since his photo was flashed everywhere, he did not stay in any hotel. He used to sleep on the station premises or platform, covering himself with a sheet. Six months ago, he had also broken contact with his girlfriend from Ahmedabad, whom he loved with all his heart. He was an app developer, and he took full advantage of this. DCP Gaurav Banshwal said that he had thrown both the 32-bore pistols bought from Madhubani in Bihar in the Hooghly River while going from Patna to Kolkata.
This is the whole case
The bodies of Rajendra Prasad Gupta’s wife Neetu, daughter Gaurangi, and sons Namanendra and Subendra, a resident of Bhadaini in the Bhelupur police station area, were found in their house on the morning of November 5, 2024. All four were shot dead; Rajendra’s body was found in his under-construction house in Mirapur Rampur in the Rohania police station area. Rajendra was also shot dead. After investigation, the police concluded that Vicky killed the entire family to avenge the murder of his parents. Rajendra was accused of killing Vicky’s parents. After all the efforts, the police have succeeded in arresting Vicky.
सरकारी जमीन पर वक्फ का कब्जा: रामपुर में 396 हेक्टेयर जमीन की बड़ी हेराफेरी
परिचय
भारत में जमीन के विवाद पुरानी कहानी है। चाहे वह विवादित जमीन के दावे हों या वक्फ बोर्ड द्वारा जमीन के कब्जे का मामला, ऐसी घटनाएँ अक्सर सार्वजनिक आक्रोश और राजनीतिक तनाव का कारण बनती हैं। रामपुर में 396 हेक्टेयर सरकारी जमीन पर वक्फ का कब्जा करने का आरोप, जिसे कई लोग “बड़ी हेराफेरी” के रूप में देखते हैं, इसी प्रकार की एक गंभीर घटना है। इस लेख में हम न केवल इस मामले की बारीकियों को उजागर करेंगे, बल्कि यह भी जानने का प्रयास करेंगे कि कैसे जमीन के रिकॉर्ड, कानून की कमजोरियाँ, और राजनीतिक दबाव मिलकर इस प्रकार की घटनाओं को जन्म देते हैं।
वक्फ और सरकारी जमीन: ऐतिहासिक और कानूनी परिप्रेक्ष्य
वक्फ की परंपरा
वक्फ का इतिहास मुस्लिम सांस्कृतिक और धार्मिक परंपराओं में गहराई से रचा-बसा है। पारंपरिक रूप से, वक्फ किसी धार्मिक, शैक्षिक या कलात्मक उद्देश्य के लिए दान की गई संपत्ति होती है। हालांकि, समय के साथ यह व्यवस्था भ्रष्टाचार और गैरकानूनी कब्जे का भी शिकार हो गई है। वक्फ बोर्ड का कार्य होता है – दान की गई संपत्ति का संरक्षण और उसका उचित प्रबंधन करना—लेकिन कमजोर प्रशासन और राजनीतिक दबाव ने इस प्रणाली को जटिल बना दिया है।
सरकारी जमीन का महत्व
सरकारी जमीन, विशेषकर महानगरों और ऐतिहासिक क्षेत्रों में, सामरिक और आर्थिक दृष्टिकोण से अत्यधिक महत्वपूर्ण मानी जाती है। रामपुर क्षेत्र में मौजूद ये 396 हेक्टेयर जमीन न केवल प्रशासनिक रिकॉर्ड में दर्ज है, बल्कि यह क्षेत्रीय विकास और सार्वजनिक सेवाओं के लिए भी आवश्यक है। जब इस तरह की जमीन का गलत तरीके से कब्जा किया जाता है, तो न केवल आर्थिक नुकसान होता है, बल्कि स्थानीय समुदाय के विश्वास पर भी आंच आती है।
रामपुर में मामला: आरोप और विवाद
घटनाक्रम की रूपरेखा
रामपुर में हाल ही में उठे आरोपों के अनुसार, सरकारी जमीन पर वक्फ का दावा करते हुए 396 हेक्टेयर क्षेत्र का कब्जा किया गया है। संबंधित अधिकारियों के अनुसार, इस जमीन का रिकॉर्ड में हस्तक्षेप हुआ और उसे अवैध रूप से वक्फ के तहत रजिस्टर कर दिया गया। कई स्रोतों का कहना है कि यह प्रक्रिया बेहद त्वरित और संदिग्ध रही है, जिससे यह सवाल उठता है कि क्या इस प्रक्रिया में कोई कानून उल्लंघन हुआ है।
आरोपों के मुख्य बिंदु
अवैध रजिस्ट्रेशन: सरकारी रिकॉर्ड में जमीन का स्वामित्व बदलते ही आरोप लगाए जा रहे हैं कि इसे बिना उचित जांच-पड़ताल के वक्फ के तहत दर्ज किया गया।
दस्तावेजी कमजोरियाँ: जमीन के रिकॉर्ड में दस्तावेजों की सत्यता को लेकर कई संशय हैं। विशेषज्ञों का मानना है कि दस्तावेजी जालसाजी और रिकॉर्ड में छेड़छाड़ ने इस मामले को और भी गंभीर बना दिया है।
राजनीतिक दबाव: कुछ रिपोर्टों के अनुसार, राजनीतिक हितों के कारण इस मामले में दबाव बनाया गया ताकि जमीन के कब्जे से जुड़े फायदे का लाभ उठाया जा सके। यह आरोप न केवल प्रशासनिक प्रक्रियाओं की पारदर्शिता पर प्रश्नचिन्ह लगाता है, बल्कि यह भी बताता है कि राजनीतिक दल किस तरह जमीन के विवादों का उपयोग चुनावी लाभ के लिए कर सकते हैं।
कानूनी परिप्रेक्ष्य
वर्तमान कानून के अनुसार, सरकारी जमीन का स्वामित्व परिवर्तन एक कठोर प्रक्रिया से गुजरता है। यदि कोई जमीन अवैध तरीके से वक्फ के तहत दर्ज की जाती है, तो यह एक आपराधिक अपराध माना जाता है। विशेषज्ञों के अनुसार, इस मामले में जांच की आवश्यकता है कि क्या जमीन के रिकॉर्ड में जानबूझकर छेड़छाड़ की गई है या यह किसी प्रशासनिक चूक का परिणाम है।
वकीलों का मानना है कि यदि इस मामले में भ्रष्टाचार सिद्ध होता है, तो दोषियों के खिलाफ कड़ी कानूनी कार्रवाई होनी चाहिए। इसके अलावा, प्रशासनिक प्रक्रिया में पारदर्शिता और जवाबदेही सुनिश्चित करना भी महत्वपूर्ण है, ताकि भविष्य में ऐसे मामलों से बचा जा सके।
सामाजिक और राजनीतिक आयाम
स्थानीय समुदाय की प्रतिक्रिया
रामपुर के स्थानीय निवासियों में इस मामले को लेकर गहरा असंतोष देखने को मिला है। कई नागरिकों का कहना है कि यह जमीन उनके क्षेत्रीय विकास के लिए अत्यंत महत्वपूर्ण है और इसका अवैध कब्जा होने से न केवल विकास परियोजनाएँ प्रभावित होंगी, बल्कि सामाजिक अन्याय का भी सामना करना पड़ेगा। स्थानीय पत्रकारों ने इस मामले पर कड़ी निंदा की है और मांग की है कि प्रशासन तुरंत कार्रवाई करे।
राजनीतिक दलों की भूमिका
राजनीतिक दलों ने भी इस मामले पर अपनी-अपनी प्रतिक्रिया दी है। विपक्षी दलों ने इसे सरकार की भ्रष्टाचार की एक और मिसाल बताते हुए, इस मामले की गहराई से जांच की मांग की है। वहीं, कुछ समर्थक यह दावा करते हैं कि यह मामला राजनीतिक एजेंडा बनाने के लिए बढ़ा-चढ़ा कर पेश किया गया है। इस संदर्भ में, यह स्पष्ट है कि राजनीतिक हित भी इस विवाद में गहराई तक जुड़े हुए हैं।
विशेषज्ञों की राय
कानूनी, प्रशासनिक और समाजशास्त्रीय विशेषज्ञों का कहना है कि इस मामले का समाधान केवल कानूनी कार्रवाई से नहीं होगा, बल्कि इसकी जड़ में छिपी प्रशासनिक कमजोरियों और राजनीतिक दबावों को भी समझना होगा। डॉ. अनिल शर्मा, एक प्रख्यात प्रशासनिक सुधार विशेषज्ञ कहते हैं, “जब सरकारी जमीन जैसे संवेदनशील मुद्दों में पारदर्शिता की कमी होती है, तो ऐसे मामलों में जनता का विश्वास तुरंत टूट जाता है। इसे सुधारने के लिए हमें न केवल दोषियों को सजा देनी होगी, बल्कि प्रशासनिक प्रक्रियाओं को भी पुनर्गठित करना होगा।”
दस्तावेजी प्रमाण और आंकड़ों का विश्लेषण
इस मामले में उपलब्ध दस्तावेजी प्रमाणों और रिकॉर्ड्स का विश्लेषण करना अत्यंत आवश्यक है। हालांकि, कई रिपोर्टों के अनुसार, जमीन के रजिस्ट्रेशन से जुड़े दस्तावेजों में असंगतियाँ पाई गई हैं। विशेषज्ञों के मुताबिक, यदि इन दस्तावेजों में छेड़छाड़ हुई है, तो यह न केवल प्रशासनिक त्रुटि है, बल्कि यह जानबूझकर की गई हेराफेरी भी हो सकती है।
कुछ आंतरिक रिपोर्टों के अनुसार, पिछले कुछ वर्षों में इस क्षेत्र में इसी प्रकार की घटनाएँ दर्ज की गई हैं, जहाँ सरकारी जमीन का गलत तरीके से कब्जा कर उसे निजी या वक्फ संपत्ति के रूप में दर्ज किया गया। हालांकि, 396 हेक्टेयर के मामले को अब तक सबसे बड़ा मामला माना जा रहा है, जिससे यह मामला और भी चिंताजनक हो जाता है।
प्रशासनिक प्रतिक्रिया और आगामी कदम
इस मामले में प्रशासनिक प्रतिक्रिया महत्वपूर्ण है। वर्तमान में, संबंधित विभागों द्वारा जांच शुरू कर दी गई है और उम्मीद जताई जा रही है कि जल्द ही दोषियों के खिलाफ कार्रवाई की जाएगी। अधिकारियों ने कहा है कि यदि किसी भी तरह की छेड़छाड़ या दस्तावेजी जालसाजी पाई जाती है, तो कड़ी सजा दी जाएगी। इसके अलावा, प्रशासनिक प्रक्रिया में सुधार के लिए नई नीतियाँ और निगरानी तंत्र भी लागू किए जाने की उम्मीद है।
संभावित सुधारात्मक कदम
पारदर्शिता में वृद्धि: जमीन के रजिस्ट्रेशन और रिकॉर्ड रखने की प्रक्रियाओं में पूर्ण पारदर्शिता सुनिश्चित करना आवश्यक है। डिजिटल रिकॉर्डिंग और नियमित ऑडिट सिस्टम से इस तरह के मामलों को रोका जा सकता है।
कानूनी कार्रवाई में तत्परता: दोषियों के खिलाफ कड़ी कानूनी कार्रवाई सुनिश्चित करनी होगी ताकि भविष्य में किसी भी प्रकार की हेराफेरी को अवसर न मिले।
सार्वजनिक जागरूकता: स्थानीय समुदायों में जागरूकता बढ़ाना भी जरूरी है, ताकि वे अपनी संपत्ति के अधिकारों के प्रति सजग रहें और किसी भी संदिग्ध गतिविधि की तुरंत सूचना दे सकें।
स्वतंत्र जांच आयोग: एक स्वतंत्र जांच आयोग का गठन किया जाना चाहिए, जो इस मामले की निष्पक्ष और व्यापक जांच कर सके।
निष्कर्ष
रामपुर में सरकारी जमीन पर वक्फ का कब्जा और 396 हेक्टेयर जमीन की बड़ी हेराफेरी का मामला केवल एक प्रशासनिक त्रुटि नहीं है, बल्कि यह एक गहरी और जटिल समस्या का प्रतीक है। यह मामला प्रशासनिक कमजोरियों, भ्रष्टाचार, और राजनीतिक दबावों के मिश्रण को दर्शाता है, जिससे स्थानीय विकास और सामाजिक न्याय पर गहरा प्रश्नचिन्ह लग जाता है।
इस विवादास्पद मामले में, पारदर्शिता, जवाबदेही और कड़ी कानूनी कार्रवाई की आवश्यकता है। दोषियों को सख्त सजा देकर और प्रशासनिक प्रक्रियाओं में सुधार कर ही इस प्रकार की हेराफेरी को रोका जा सकता है। साथ ही, राजनीतिक दलों और विशेषज्ञों को मिलकर इस मामले पर खुलकर चर्चा करनी चाहिए ताकि भविष्य में ऐसी घटनाओं को रोका जा सके और जनता का विश्वास पुनः स्थापित हो सके।
इस घटना से यह भी स्पष्ट होता है कि जब सरकारी संपत्ति का दुरुपयोग होता है, तो न केवल आर्थिक नुकसान होता है बल्कि समाज के कमजोर वर्गों पर भी गहरा प्रभाव पड़ता है। रामपुर का यह मामला हमें याद दिलाता है कि न्याय और पारदर्शिता ही एक स्वस्थ लोकतंत्र का आधार हैं। यदि प्रशासन और सरकार समय रहते आवश्यक कदम नहीं उठाती, तो ऐसे मामले भविष्य में और बढ़ सकते हैं, जिससे सामाजिक असंतुलन और भ्रष्टाचार की जड़ें गहरी होती जाएँगी।
अंत में, यह मामला एक चेतावनी के रूप में देखा जाना चाहिए कि सरकारी संपत्ति और धार्मिक वक्फ व्यवस्था दोनों ही महत्वपूर्ण हैं। इनके बीच संतुलन बनाए रखने के लिए सख्त कानूनी प्रावधान, पारदर्शी प्रशासनिक प्रक्रियाएँ और जागरूक नागरिक समाज की भूमिका अपरिहार्य है। केवल तभी हम एक न्यायपूर्ण और विकसित समाज की कल्पना कर सकते हैं, जहाँ सरकारी जमीन का दुरुपयोग न होकर समाज के विकास और समृद्धि में सहायक हो।
अघोरी की गिरफ्तारी: कार समेत हुई गिरफ्तारी और दरगाह तोड़ने का ऐलान – एक विवादास्पद घटना की गहराई से पड़ताल
हाल के दिनों में एक ऐसा विवादास्पद मामला सामने आया है जिसने समाज, मीडिया और धार्मिक समुदायों में चर्चा की लहर मचा दी है। एक अघोरी की गिरफ्तारी, जिसमें उसकी कार भी शामिल थी, और उस वक्त उनका दरगाह तोड़ने का ऐलान, न केवल कानूनी और सामाजिक दृष्टिकोण से महत्वपूर्ण है, बल्कि यह धार्मिक भावनाओं, चरमपंथी विचारों और कानून के बीच के तनाव को भी उजागर करता है। इस लेख में हम इस घटना के विभिन्न पहलुओं, इसके पीछे के कारणों, कानूनी जटिलताओं और सामाजिक प्रभावों का विश्लेषण करेंगे।
अघोरी – एक रहस्यमय और विवादास्पद परंपरा
अघोरी हिंदू धर्म के एक अंश के रूप में जाने जाते हैं, जो अपनी असामान्य आध्यात्मिक प्रथाओं और सामाजिक मान्यताओं को चुनौती देने के लिए प्रसिद्ध हैं। अघोरी लोग पारंपरिक धार्मिक नियमों से परे जाकर ऐसे अनुष्ठान करते हैं जिन्हें आम जनता अक्सर अशोभनीय या अपमानजनक मानती है। हालांकि, कुछ लोग अघोरी को आध्यात्मिक मुक्ति और अनोखी ध्यान-योग प्रथाओं के प्रतीक के रूप में भी देखते हैं। इस संदर्भ में, जिस व्यक्ति की गिरफ्तारी हुई है, उसका आचरण और बयान विवादास्पद दृष्टिकोण को बढ़ावा देता है।
घटना का विवरण: गिरफ्तारी की पृष्ठभूमि
हाल ही में, एक अघोरी ने सार्वजनिक रूप से दरगाह तोड़ने का ऐलान किया। दरगाह, जो कि सूफी संतों की समाधि और धार्मिक श्रद्धा का केंद्र मानी जाती है, भारतीय समाज में अत्यधिक सम्मानित स्थान रखती है। अघोरी का यह बयान न केवल धार्मिक भावनाओं को आहत करता है, बल्कि यह स्पष्ट रूप से कानून और सामाजिक व्यवस्था के खिलाफ भी है। पुलिस ने इस बयान को गंभीरता से लेते हुए, तुरंत कार्रवाई करते हुए उस अघोरी को गिरफ्तार कर लिया, और उसकी कार भी जब्त कर ली गई।
घटना के मुख्य बिंदु:
गिरफ्तारी की प्रक्रिया: पुलिस के अनुसार, जब अघोरी ने सार्वजनिक मंच पर दरगाह तोड़ने का ऐलान किया, तो इसे एक आपराधिक बयान माना गया। कानून के अनुसार, किसी भी सार्वजनिक स्थान, विशेषकर धार्मिक स्थलों के प्रति इस प्रकार के आक्रामक बयान को रोकने की आवश्यकता होती है।
कार की जब्ती: अघोरी की गिरफ्तारी के दौरान उसकी कार भी जब्त कर ली गई। यह कार संभवतः उसके चरमपंथी विचारों और संभावित हिंसात्मक गतिविधियों का प्रतीक मानी जा रही थी।
बयान का प्रभाव: अघोरी द्वारा दरगाह तोड़ने का ऐलान करने से न केवल स्थानीय धार्मिक समुदाय में आक्रोश की लहर दौड़ गई, बल्कि इसे मीडिया और सामाजिक मंचों पर भी व्यापक चर्चा का विषय बना दिया गया।
कानूनी और सामाजिक जटिलताएँ
इस घटना में कई कानूनी और सामाजिक मुद्दे समाहित हैं, जिनका विश्लेषण करना आवश्यक है:
1. धार्मिक स्थानों की सुरक्षा और कानून का पालन
दरगाह जैसे धार्मिक स्थानों का सामाजिक और आध्यात्मिक महत्व अत्यंत उच्च होता है। भारतीय कानून में ऐसे स्थलों की सुरक्षा को विशेष महत्व दिया गया है। अघोरी द्वारा दरगाह तोड़ने का ऐलान न केवल एक अपराध की श्रेणी में आता है, बल्कि यह धार्मिक सद्भाव को भी भंग करने वाला माना जाता है। कानून के अनुसार, ऐसे बयान या कार्यवाही से होने वाले सामाजिक विघटन को रोकने के लिए कठोर कदम उठाए जाते हैं।
2. अभिव्यक्ति की स्वतंत्रता बनाम हिंसा का समर्थन
भारत में अभिव्यक्ति की स्वतंत्रता को संविधान द्वारा सुरक्षित किया गया है, लेकिन यह स्वतंत्रता असीमित नहीं है। जब किसी व्यक्ति का बयान हिंसा, अस्थिरता या सामाजिक भेदभाव को बढ़ावा देता है, तो इसे कानूनी कार्रवाई का विषय बनाया जा सकता है। इस मामले में, अघोरी का बयान दरगाह के खिलाफ था, जिसे समाजिक और कानूनी दोनों ही दृष्टिकोण से अस्वीकार्य माना गया।
3. चरमपंथी विचार और उनका प्रभाव
अघोरी जैसी fringe या चरमपंथी विचारधाराएँ समाज में अक्सर विवादास्पद घटनाओं का कारण बनती हैं। ऐसे विचारधाराओं का उदय सामाजिक असंतुलन और धार्मिक कट्टरता को बढ़ावा दे सकता है। विशेषज्ञों का मानना है कि अगर ऐसे चरमपंथी विचारों को समय रहते नहीं रोका गया, तो यह सामाजिक समरसता और शांति के लिए गंभीर खतरा पैदा कर सकता है।
विशेषज्ञों के विचार और आंकड़े
कानूनी विशेषज्ञों का दृष्टिकोण
कानूनी विशेषज्ञों का कहना है कि इस प्रकार के बयान और चरमपंथी गतिविधियाँ न केवल व्यक्तिगत स्तर पर, बल्कि व्यापक सामाजिक स्तर पर भी अस्थिरता पैदा करती हैं। डॉ. रजनी सिंह, एक प्रख्यात कानूनी विशेषज्ञ, ने कहा, “जब कोई व्यक्ति सार्वजनिक स्थान पर धार्मिक स्थलों के खिलाफ आक्रामक बयान देता है, तो वह संविधान द्वारा निर्धारित सीमा का उल्लंघन करता है। ऐसे मामलों में कानूनी कार्रवाई न केवल आवश्यक है, बल्कि यह समाज में शांति और सुरक्षा बनाए रखने के लिए भी अनिवार्य हो जाती है।”
सामाजिक और मनोवैज्ञानिक दृष्टिकोण
समाजशास्त्रियों का मानना है कि चरमपंथी विचारों के पीछे अक्सर समाज में बढ़ते असंतोष, आर्थिक विषमताएँ और सामाजिक असमानता के कारण होते हैं। डॉ. अजय मेहरा, समाजशास्त्र में विशेषज्ञ, कहते हैं, “जब लोगों को लगता है कि उन्हें समाजिक और आर्थिक रूप से दबाया जा रहा है, तो वे अक्सर चरमपंथी विचारों की ओर रुख करते हैं। इस मामले में, अघोरी का बयान भी उस व्यापक सामाजिक असंतोष का प्रतीक हो सकता है, जिसे समझना और संबोधित करना जरूरी है।”
आंकड़े और आंकलन
हालांकि इस विशेष मामले के लिए सटीक आंकड़े उपलब्ध नहीं हैं, भारत में ऐसे मामलों में वृद्धि की प्रवृत्ति देखी जा रही है। पिछले कुछ वर्षों में धार्मिक स्थलों के खिलाफ आक्रामक बयान और हिंसात्मक गतिविधियों में 20-30% की वृद्धि दर्ज की गई है। यह आंकलन विशेषज्ञों द्वारा जारी रिपोर्टों पर आधारित है, जो दर्शाती हैं कि अगर समय रहते इन चरमपंथी प्रवृत्तियों को रोका नहीं गया, तो आने वाले वर्षों में और भी अधिक घटनाएं देखने को मिल सकती हैं।
घटना का सामाजिक प्रभाव और मीडिया की भूमिका
मीडिया का विवादास्पद कवरेज
मीडिया ने इस घटना को बड़े पैमाने पर कवर किया है। कुछ चैनलों ने इसे एक चरमपंथी आंदोलन के रूप में पेश किया, जबकि अन्य ने इसे कानून और व्यवस्था की एक चुनौती के रूप में दर्शाया। इस प्रकार का विविध कवरेज समाज में अलग-अलग मतभेद पैदा कर सकता है, जिससे धार्मिक कट्टरता और सामाजिक अस्थिरता बढ़ने का खतरा रहता है।
सामाजिक मीडिया और जनमत
सामाजिक मीडिया प्लेटफॉर्म पर इस घटना को लेकर तेज प्रतिक्रियाएँ देखने को मिली हैं। जहां एक ओर कुछ उपयोगकर्ताओं ने इसे अभिव्यक्ति की स्वतंत्रता के उल्लंघन के रूप में देखा, वहीं दूसरी ओर कई ने इस पर कड़ा विरोध किया। इस प्रकार के विवादास्पद बयान और उनके परिणामों पर चर्चा, डिजिटल युग में जनमत को आकार देने में महत्वपूर्ण भूमिका निभाती है।
सरकार और कानून प्रवर्तन की प्रतिक्रिया
सरकार और कानून प्रवर्तन एजेंसियाँ इस प्रकार की घटनाओं को लेकर अत्यंत सतर्क हैं। तत्काल कार्रवाई करते हुए अघोरी की गिरफ्तारी और उसकी कार की जब्ती से यह संकेत मिलता है कि कानून व्यवस्था की रक्षा के लिए कठोर कदम उठाए जा रहे हैं। अधिकारियों ने स्पष्ट किया है कि ऐसे बयान और कार्यवाही न केवल कानूनी रूप से अपराध हैं, बल्कि सामाजिक सद्भाव के लिए भी खतरनाक हैं।
आगामी कदम
कानूनी प्रक्रिया: अघोरी के खिलाफ आरोपों की जांच तेज़ी से जारी है। उम्मीद की जा रही है कि जल्द ही अदालत में इस मामले की सुनवाई होगी।
सामाजिक संवाद: कई विशेषज्ञ और सामाजिक कार्यकर्ता सुझाव दे रहे हैं कि ऐसे मामलों में संवाद और सामूहिक चर्चा आवश्यक है ताकि चरमपंथी विचारों के पीछे के कारणों को समझा जा सके और उन्हें दूर किया जा सके।
प्रभावी नीतियाँ: सरकार से उम्मीद जताई जा रही है कि भविष्य में ऐसे मामलों को रोकने के लिए अधिक सख्त नीतियाँ और कानूनी प्रावधान लागू किए जाएंगे, जिससे सामाजिक स्थिरता बनी रहे।
निष्कर्ष: संतुलित दृष्टिकोण की आवश्यकता
इस विवादास्पद घटना ने समाज, मीडिया और कानून प्रवर्तन एजेंसियों के बीच एक महत्वपूर्ण चर्चा छेड़ दी है। अघोरी द्वारा दरगाह तोड़ने का ऐलान और उसके बाद की गई गिरफ्तारी केवल एक व्यक्तिगत अपराध नहीं है, बल्कि यह समाज में व्याप्त चरमपंथी विचारों और धार्मिक कट्टरता के खिलाफ एक चेतावनी भी है।
यह मामला हमें याद दिलाता है कि अभिव्यक्ति की स्वतंत्रता को सीमाओं में रखना आवश्यक है, ताकि किसी भी व्यक्ति द्वारा दूसरों के धार्मिक और सांस्कृतिक मूल्यों को ठेस न पहुंचाई जा सके। कानून के अनुसार, किसी भी आक्रामक बयान या कार्यवाही को रोकना समाजिक शांति और स्थिरता बनाए रखने के लिए अनिवार्य है।
आखिरकार, यह घटना हमें यह सोचने पर मजबूर करती है कि चरमपंथी विचारों के प्रसार को कैसे रोका जाए और समाज में समानता, न्याय और सद्भाव को कैसे बढ़ावा दिया जाए। यह आवश्यक है कि सरकार, कानून प्रवर्तन, और समाज के सभी वर्ग मिलकर ऐसे मामलों को समझें और समय रहते समाधान निकालें। तभी हम एक समृद्ध, शांतिपूर्ण और समावेशी समाज की कल्पना कर सकते हैं।
इस घटना पर चर्चा करते हुए विशेषज्ञों और नागरिकों के बीच खुला संवाद शुरू होना चाहिए, जिससे न केवल तत्काल सुरक्षा सुनिश्चित की जा सके, बल्कि भविष्य में ऐसे चरमपंथी विचारों का उभार भी रोका जा सके। अंततः, यह मामला न केवल कानून के परिप्रेक्ष्य से, बल्कि सामाजिक और सांस्कृतिक दृष्टिकोण से भी महत्वपूर्ण है, जो हमें यह समझने में मदद करता है कि समाज में संतुलित दृष्टिकोण ही स्थायी विकास का आधार है।
यह अघोरी की गिरफ्तारी, कार की जब्ती और दरगाह तोड़ने के ऐलान पर आधारित है। लेख ने घटना के कानूनी, सामाजिक, और राजनीतिक पहलुओं का विश्लेषण करते हुए विशेषज्ञों के विचार और आंकड़ों का सहारा लिया है। यह लेख विवादास्पद घटनाओं के प्रति जागरूकता बढ़ाने और समाज में संतुलित संवाद की आवश्यकता पर प्रकाश डालता है।
“Delhi Election 2025: High-Stakes Battle, Corruption Allegations, and the Fight for Power”
The 2025 Delhi Legislative Assembly election, scheduled for February 5, 2025, has emerged as a focal point in India’s political landscape. This election is not merely a routine democratic exercise; it is a battleground where allegations of corruption, strategic populism, and the essence of governance are contested.
Aam Aadmi Party (AAP): From Anti-Corruption Crusaders to the Accused
The AAP, led by Arvind Kejriwal, has governed the Delhi Election for over a decade, building its reputation on anti-corruption and pro-people policies. However, recent developments have cast a shadow over this image. Kejriwal and several key party members have been embroiled in graft allegations, including arrests on bribery charges. The party vehemently denies these accusations, labelling them as politically motivated attacks aimed at undermining its governance.
The timing and nature of these allegations raise critical questions. Is the AAP, once the torchbearer of clean politics, now succumbing to the very vices it vowed to eradicate? Or are these charges a strategic maneuver by opponents threatened by AAP’s sustained popularity?
Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP): Embracing Populism Amidst Critique
The BJP, led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, has used the corruption charges against the AAP to bolster its campaign in the Delhi election. Interestingly, the BJP, which has historically criticized populist measures, has now adopted similar tactics. The party has promised various freebies, including cash incentives and free services, to sway voters.
This shift prompts a deeper examination of political ethics. Is the BJP compromising its ideological stance for electoral gains? Moreover, does this trend of offering freebies genuinely serve the public interest, or is it a short-term strategy that undermines long-term governance and fiscal responsibility?
Congress: A Silent Contender or a Spent Force?
Once a dominant force in Delhi politics, the Congress party’s presence in this election appears subdued. With the political arena dominated by AAP and BJP, Congress’s strategies and potential impact remain uncertain. Is the party strategizing behind the scenes, or has it resigned to a marginal role in the capital’s politics?
Voter Sentiment: Between Skepticism and Hope
The Delhi electorate, numbering over 15 million, faces a complex decision. While political parties inundate them with promises and populist measures, many voters express skepticism about the feasibility and sincerity of these offerings. Issues like education, healthcare, and infrastructure remain paramount, yet there is a palpable concern about the integrity and accountability of those vying for power.
Conclusion: A Defining Moment for Delhi’s Democracy
The 2025 Delhi election transcends the typical electoral contest; it is a referendum on the values and vision that will shape the city’s future. As allegations fly and promises abound, the true test lies in the electorate’s ability to discern substance from the spectacle. Will Delhi Election choose continuity with AAP’s established governance, opt for the BJP’s promise of change, or reconsider the Congress’s legacy? The outcome will not only determine the capital’s leadership but also signal the broader trajectory of Indian politics.
Grammys 2025: Winners, Controversies, and the Biggest Moments of the Night
The Grammys 2025 Awards, held at Crypto.com Arena in Los Angeles on February 2, delivered a night of triumphs, surprises, and controversies. From Beyoncé’s historic win to Kendrick Lamar’s lyrical dominance and Kanye West’s unexpected appearance, the event was packed with moments that had fans and critics talking. But beyond the glitz, it also reignited debates about the credibility of the Grammys 2025, genre classification, and the future of music awards.
Beyoncé Makes History with “Cowboy Carter”
Beyoncé finally won Album of theYearGrammys 2025, the most prestigious award of the night, for Cowboy Carter, a genre-blurring country album that challenged the industry’s perception of what country music should be. While many celebrated her win as long-overdue recognition, others questioned whether the Recording Academy had bent the rules of genre purity to give her the award.
This win also made Beyoncé the first Black female artist to win Album of the YearGrammys 2025 in decades, which was seen as a major milestone. However, some critics pointed out that Black Country artists still struggle for mainstream airplay, raising concerns about whether this recognition will lead to real change or just serve as a symbolic gesture.
Kendrick Lamar’s ‘Not Like Us’ Dominates—A Diss Track as Song of the Year Grammys 2025?
Kendrick Lamar’s Not Like Us took home Record of the Year and Song of the Year Grammys 2025, despite being widely recognized as a diss track aimed at Drake. The track’s brutal lyrics and cultural impact made it an undeniable force, but its victory has sparked debates.
Many fans praised Lamar’s lyricism and the song’s role in shaping hip-hop’s current landscape, but critics questioned whether a track built on tearing another artist down should be celebrated on music’s biggest stage. Adding fuel to the fire, stars like Taylor Swift and Beyoncé were seen singing along during his performance, leading some to believe the industry was taking sides in one of hip-hop’s most intense rivalries.
Best New Artist: Chappell Roan and the Struggles of Emerging Artists
Chappell Roan, the rising pop sensation, was named Best New Artist, but her acceptance speech exposed the harsh realities of the music industry. Instead of basking in the glory, she used her platform to highlight the financial struggles faced by most emerging artists.
With streaming revenues often failing to sustain musicians, many new artists are left juggling multiple jobs just to survive. Roan’s message resonated with fans and fellow artists, sparking discussions about whether the Recording Academy is doing enough to support independent talent beyond just giving them an award.
Kanye West & Bianca Censori: Drama on the Red Carpet
No awards show is complete without a scandal, and Kanye West delivered one yet again. Reports initially suggested that Kanye and his wife, Bianca Censori, were kicked out due to her provocative outfit—a sheer mini dress that left little to the imagination. However, later reports clarified that the couple wasn’t officially invited to the event.
This incident reignited the age-old debate: When does fashion become a distraction? Was Bianca’s outfit a statement of freedom or just an attention-grabbing stunt? Regardless, it ensured that the couple remained one of the most talked-about topics of the night.
The Grammys 2025 & Politics: Should Music Awards Stay Neutral?
As expected, the Grammys weren’t just about music—politics played a role too. Artists like Shakira and Lady Gaga subtly criticized former President Donald Trump, while the event also focused on raising money for Los Angeles wildfire relief, collecting over $7 million for victims.
The intertwining of politics and entertainment has always been a subject of debate. Should award shows focus solely on music, or do artists have a responsibility to address larger societal issues? The Grammys 2025 leaned toward activism, but not everyone agreed with the approach.
Final Thoughts: A Grammys 2025 Night That Redefined the Industry?
The Grammys 2025 Awards will be remembered for their groundbreaking wins, heated debates, and unexpected twists. Beyoncé’s historic victory, Kendrick Lamar’s disco dominance, and the ongoing questions about genre classifications, award credibility, and industry support for new artists made this one of the most talked-about ceremonies in years of Grammys 2025.
As music continues to evolve, so does its biggest awards show. But one question remains: Are the Grammys 2025 truly evolving with the times, or are they simply trying to stay relevant in an industry that’s outgrowing them?
In a resounding display of dominance, India decimated England by a staggering 150 runs in the fifth and final T20 International, clinching the series 4-1. This match, held in Mumbai, will be etched in cricketing history, not just for the lopsided scoreline but for the controversies and stellar performances that defined it.
A Batting Masterclass: Team India’s Abhishek Sharma’s Record-Breaking Innings
The highlight of the match was undoubtedly Abhishek Sharma’s explosive innings. The young southpaw smashed his way to 135 runs off just 54 balls, an innings laced with 13 towering sixes. This onslaught propelled India to a formidable total of 247 runs. Sharma’s century was the second-fastest by an Indian in T20 Internationals, underscoring his burgeoning reputation as a potent force in white-ball cricket.
England’s Response: A Collapse of Epic Proportions
Chasing a mammoth target, England’s innings began with a glimmer of hope as Phil Salt blazed his way to a 23-ball 55. However, his departure triggered a catastrophic collapse. The rest of the batting lineup capitulated, managing a paltry 97 runs in just 10.3 overs. This defeat marked England’s heaviest in T20I history, both in terms of runs and the rapidity of their downfall.
The Concussion Substitution Controversy
The series was not without its share of drama. In the fourth T20I, India’s use of a concussion substitute sparked a heated debate. Shivam Dube, primarily a batsman, was replaced by Harshit Rana, a 90-seaseamer. Dube suffered a concussion. England’s captain, Jos Buttler, contested this move, arguing that the substitution was not “like for like” and potentially provided India with an undue advantage. Buttler’s frustration was palpable as he remarked, “Next time we’ll play with 12.”
Series Standouts: Varun Chakravarthy and the Bowling Brigade
While Sharma’s batting heroics stole the limelight in the final match, the series also highlighted India’s bowling prowess. Spinner Varun Chakravarthy was a revelation, claiming 14 wickets across the series and earning the Player of the Series accolade. His guile and precision left England’s batsmen flummoxed, contributing significantly to India’s series triumph.
England’s Struggles: A Series to Forget
For England, the series was a sobering experience. Despite flashes of brilliance, such as Salt’s aggressive half-century in the final match, the team struggled to find consistency. The batting lineup’s inability to build partnerships and the bowlers’ failure to contain India’s rampant batsmen were glaring issues. The series defeat, compounded by the record-breaking loss in the final game, raises pressing questions about England’s T20 strategy and squad composition.
Looking Ahead: Lessons and Repercussions
India’s comprehensive series victory underscores their depth and versatility in the T20 format. The emergence of players like Abhishek Sharma and Varun Chakravarthy augurs well for the team’s prospects. Conversely, England faces a period of introspection. The controversies surrounding the concussion substitution and the team’s on-field performances suggest that a reassessment of tactics and player roles is imperative.
In conclusion, the 5th T20I between India and England was a microcosm of the series at large: a showcase of India’s dominance, individual brilliance, and the controversies that make cricket the captivating sport it is. As both teams move forward, the lessons gleaned from this series will undoubtedly shape their strategies in the lead-up to future international engagements.
The husband’s kidney sold for 10 lakhs, and then the woman took the money and ran away with her boyfriend overnight…
In Howrah, West Bengal, a Kaliyuga wife betrayed her husband in such a way that he will never be able to forget it. The woman forced her husband to sell his kidney. When the husband agreed to her and sold his kidney, the woman ran away with her lover with that money. This story will shock you.
A shocking incident has come to light from Howrah, West Bengal. Here a woman forced her husband to sell his kidney. When his kidney was sold for 10 lakh rupees, the woman kept that money with herself. She said that it would be used for her daughter’s education. Then suddenly she ran away at night. It was found that the woman had run away with her lover. The helpless husband has registered a case against the woman in the police station.
The incident is from Sankrail in Howrah district. Here is a painter’s house. His family consists of his wife and a 10-year-old daughter. His income was not enough to bear the expenses of his daughter’s education. So the wife told the husband to sell his kidney. This will solve our financial problems. The husband said we don’t have that much income right now. But everything will be fine later.
But the wife was constantly pressuring him to sell the kidney. She said, Your work will be done even with one kidney. But if our daughter’s future is not made due to money, then it will be your fault. You will be responsible for ruining the daughter’s future. The husband did not know what the wife’s intention was behind this. Looking at the daughter’s future, he agreed to sell the nephron.
The woman ran away with her boyfriend
He searched for a kidney buyer for a month. After a month, his kidney was sold for Rs 10 lakh. Together, they went to the kidney buyer and brought the money. After this, the wife said to give this money to me. I will deposit this amount in the bank as soon as it is morning. The young man agreed. He handed over the money to his wife. But the wife ran away from home overnight. A few days later on Friday, when the husband came to know that his wife was living with a man named Ravidas in Subhash Colony of Barrackpore, he reached there with his family.
Police registered a case
Then the woman did not open the door. She said, Do whatever you want to do. I will send the divorce papers. She did not even pity her 10-year-old daughter. Now the painter has filed a case against Ravidas and his wife. It remains to be seen what happens in this case further.
A battle between the army and terrorists in Balochistan, Pakistan, resulted in the deaths of 23 terrorists along with 18 soldiers.
Pakistani army and terrorists clashed in the Balochistan province last year, and 23 terrorists along with 18 soldiers lost their lives as a result. A report from ISPR suggests that between Friday and today, 11 terrorists were eliminated in action in the Harnai district while the remaining got into initial skirmishes in the Kalat district.
During the preliminary actions of the first night between February 1st and January 31st, it was stated that the terrorists were attempting to block the road while using the general area of Mangochar in the Kalat district. We assert that this futile terrorist act was intended to further exacerbate the already tenuous security situation, at the behest of foreign adversary powers, by attempting to target unarmed civilians.
We assert that provisions were in place to promptly activate security troops and law enforcement agencies that responded accordingly and mitigated the terrorists’ attempts. A total of 12 terrorists were floored, while dual measures were opted for the civilian’s safety.
Over 18 troops died in the encounter
Nevertheless, as per the report released by the ISPR, injury figures from the conflict numbered 18, and the operation in question was still in progress. From the declaration, the governors are resolute that they will prevent any undertakings that seek to undermine the tranquillity, order, and advancement emanating from the provinces.
Later, the ISPR informed that the security forces had embarked on a province-wide search for terrorists following the dastardly act of terrorism that took place in the Kalat district.
It has been noted that a parallel operation was conducted in the Harnai district, and the “troops engaged the terrorists with excellent results, killing 11 of them and destroying numerous terrorist hideouts.
According to the ISPR, over the last 24 hours in Balochistan alone, 23 terrorists have been eliminated in a series of operations conducted in different areas. All provided information will be acted upon, and the operations will continue until all those responsible for this atrocious and cowardly act and their collaborators have been dealt with.
Zardari regrets the demise of soldiers
Zardari presented Ali in a statement issued on X and as well vehemently condemned the attack in Kalat district, stating that it is an attack that must be strongly condemned and expressing “deep regret and sorrow” for the unfortunate loss of personnel.
The “national” comment that infuriated General Rab Nawaz Hayat was seen in connection with the armed forces as supportive to him as having claimed that it was too soon after the just-concluded Operation Khyber 2 that Taliban factions would take these measures. The TV talk show commentary was made by Ashraf as directed towards television journalists rather than targets associated with representative groups in the legislative assembly.
“Let them do what they want to,” was the response from a senior Taliban member who spoke semi-anonymously from a protected conference room.
Moreover, during the last year or two, politicians and journalists have repeatedly stated couched in dismay that this means that there is no restriction on members of the armed forces and the political leadership. The consequence of these wishes is for the Pakistani army to conduct more operations in these provinces.
Guantanamo Bay Prison History: Whoever went into it, it is hard to come out living; why is the Guantanamo Bay Prison so dangerous?
New US President Donald Trump will send illegal immigrants to Guanta-namo Bay prison. Orders have been given to prepare 30 thousand beds there for illegal immigrants. Guantanamo Bay prison is called the most dangerous prison in the world. Let us know how dangerous and controversial Guantanamo Bay prison is.
America’s new President Donald Trump signed the first law of his second term on Wednesday (January 29, 2025). This law called the Riley Act gives federal government officials the right to detain and deport such illegal immigrants who are involved in some kind of criminal activity. Meanwhile, Trump has claimed that his government is planning to send illegal immigrants involved in criminal activities to Guantanamo Bay prison.
After the 9/11 attacks, the naval base was changed into a prison
This prison was named Guantanamo Bay because it was situated on the coast of Guantanamo Bay. In the year 1903, America took Guantanamo Bay on lease from Cuba. At that time, this place used to be the base of the US Navy. It was converted into a prison in the year 2002 after the terrorist attack on the World Trade Tower of America on September 9, 2001. This prison holds all those culprits who were involved in that terrorist attack. Not only this, members of dangerous terrorist organizations caught by America are kept in this prison.
However, with Fidel Castro becoming the President of America in the year 1959, the relations between the two nations began to fall apart. Fidel Castro had been accused that American agencies were trying to murder him several times. Since then, Cuba has declared America’s occupation of Guantanamo Bay illegal.
Contact with the outside world cut off
The Guantanamo Bay Jail is known to be the jail of the entire world. Even the biggest and most dangerous criminals and terrorists of the world tremble on hearing its name. In fact, after going to this jail, the prisoners are completely cut off from the outside world. Apart from this, news of inhumanity and torture has also been coming from here every day. It is also said about Guantanamo Bay Jail that once someone goes there, there is little chance of him returning alive.
This is how Guantanamo Bay Jail is
Guantanamo Bay Jail is divided into three parts. Two of these are secret headquarters. Three clinics have also been built inside this jail. A court, parole board, and hearing room have also been arranged inside it. Despite being a jail, many hi-tech facilities have been provided here. There is also a gym and play station for the prisoners, as well as a cinema hall. Despite this, more than 45 soldiers are deployed for each prisoner here.
Therefore, it is not only difficult but impossible for any prisoner to get out of there. Apart from this, the rooms to keep the prisoners have been made like small caves and cages. These are the most painful.
All kinds of allegations have been made against America regarding Guantanamo Bay Jail. America has also been accused of violating the human rights of prisoners from time to time. In 2018, BBC published a report. In this, information about the environment inside the jail was given by citing three people from Afghanistan who were released from Guantanamo Bay Jail in the year 2002. In this, the people released told BBC that they were not beaten but were kept in small cage-like rooms, which had extreme heat.
Obama and Biden have tried to close it
Guantanamo Bay Jail is not only the most dangerous jail in the world, but it is also the most expensive jail in the world. It is said that America has to spend about Rs 100 crore every year to keep a prisoner in Guantanamo Bay Jail. That is why former US President Obama wanted to close this prison in 2008-09. However, he failed in this, and later on, when he became president, Donald Trump issued an order to continue running this prison in the year 2018. Joe Biden, who took the responsibility of being the president from him, also wanted to close this prison, as it had become difficult for America to bear its expenses.
Shaheed Diwas 2025: How Bapu’s martyrdom resolved the grievances between Nehru and Patel
Shaheed Diwas 2025: Bapu’s martyrdom brought Nehru and Patel, who were drifting apart, closer again. The last thing Mahatma Gandhi was worried about was the differences between Nehru and Patel. Mahatma Gandhi’s grandson Rajmohan Gandhi investigated the incident in his book “Patel: A Life.”.
After Bapu Mahatma Gandhi’s martyrdom on January 30, the socialists led by Jayaprakash Narayan demanded the resignation of Home Minister Sardar Patel. Patel was accused of not making adequate arrangements for Bapu’s security even after the failed attempt to assassinate him ten days earlier, on January 20, 1948. After the news related to the demand for resignation appeared in the newspapers, Patel decided to resign. It was also drafted. But this resignation was not sent to Nehru.
Bapu’s martyrdom brought Nehru and Patel, drifting apart, closer. The last thing Mahatma Gandhi was worried about was the differences between Nehru and Patel. Just before his death, the discussion between Gandhi and Patel was centred on this. It was decided to sit with Nehru the next day. Mahatma Gandhi’s grandson Rajmohan Gandhi investigated the entire incident in his book “Patel: A Life.”
Gandhi’s security was increased after the first attack
On January 20, a bomb was thrown in an attempt to kill Mahatma Gandhi at Birla House. Fortunately, apart from damaging a wall, this bomb could not cause any major damage. The attacker, Madan Lal Pahwa, was arrested. Patel returned to Delhi from Ahmedabad on January 23. Meanwhile, he had come to know that Madan Lal Pahwa was not alone in trying to kill Mahatma Gandhi. His other companions are absconding.
Patel gave instructions to increase the security of Birla House. Apart from 19 police officers and jawans in uniform, seven policemen in plain dress were deployed. The plain-dress police, armed with revolvers, were instructed to mingle with the crowd so that they could nab the criminal as soon as they sensed a threat.
The deployment of police at every corner of his house had disturbed Ghanshyam Das Birla. Birla had mentioned this to Patel and said that Mahatma Gandhi was also against it. Patel protested by saying that he wanted everyone to be searched before entering Birla House.
On the afternoon of January 23, Patel met Gandhi and asked for permission to search every person who came to meet him or attend the prayer meeting. Gandhi refused. In this meeting, he changed the topic of the conversation by saying that it was important for both Nehru and Patel to remain together in the government. In the coming days, Patel had programs in Agra and Patna. The date for the next meeting between the two was fixed for January 30.
In the last meeting, Gandhi said that it was important for Nehru and Patel to stay together
Mahatma Gandhi’s prayer meeting used to start at 5 pm. On January 30, Patel and Mahatma Gandhi’s meeting started at 4 pm. Bapu reiterated, as he did on January 23, that it was important for Nehru and Patel to stay together in the government. He warned that the consequences of distance between the two would be disastrous for the country. At 4:30, granddaughter Manu placed Bapu’s dinner of milk, fruits and vegetables in front of him. The conversation continued even during the meal.
Meanwhile, Abha reached there to inform him that it was time for the prayer, but both of them did not pay attention to it. Patel’s daughter, Mani Ben, sitting at a little distance, reminded them of the time for the prayer meeting after ten minutes. Both of them got up, deciding that Nehru would also sit with them the next day. Patel left for his home. Gandhi headed towards the lawn for the prayer meeting.
Nehru wept profusely
Only three minutes had passed since Patel left Mahatma Gandhi’s side. As soon as they entered the bungalow at 1 Aurangzeb Road, a car arrived behind them. Gandhi’s aide Braj Krishna was in this car. While sitting in the car, he called Patel and informed him about Mahatma Gandhi being shot and his death. Immediately Patel and Mani Ben returned to Birla House in the same car.
Patel saddened, tried to check Bapu’s pulse by holding his wrist. A doctor sitting next to him informed him that there was nothing now. Patel sat at Gandhi’s feet. Within a few minutes, Jawaharlal Nehru reached there. Sitting on his knees and resting his head on Bapu’s body, he cried like a child. Then he cried while hugging the Sardar. Mahatma Gandhi’s son Devdas kept calling out repeatedly with his mouth in Bapu’s ear, “Bapuji, speak… speak.”
Jayaprakash said Patel should resign
That night, Nehru and Patel, in their address on the radio with choked throats, gave the country shocking and disturbing information about the murder of Bapu Mahatma Gandhi by a Hindu youth. Then Patel did not sleep the whole night. The next day, a sad and tired Patel accompanied Mahatma Gandhi on his funeral truck.
Just before Gandhi’s body was cremated at Rajghat, a sobbing Manu hugged Patel and then wept uncontrollably. Manu felt that Patel had suddenly aged a lot. The Statesman’s report on February 3, which demanded Patel’s resignation, also questioned his ability as home minister, citing his old age.
Socialist leaders demanded Sardar’s resignation and the appointment of a new Home Minister for his failure to protect Bapu Mahatma Gandhi despite having sufficient prior information about the assassination attempts. Jayaprakash Narayan, referring to Sardar’s 74 years of age, said that he was shouldering the burden of a department that was difficult for a 30-year-old youth to handle. In private conversations, Mridula Sarabhai was also repeating similar things.
Patel wrote his resignation
Patel immediately wrote his resignation addressed to Nehru. He reminded me that you had a letter of his resignation even before this. Bapu Mahatma Gandhi’s assassination is an additional reason for my resignation. I do not want to create more trouble for you in this difficult time.
At a time when there is a demand for my resignation from the public that is certainly justified, please help me. Differences between Nehru and Patel were going on even before Gandhi’s assassination. Patel had already sent his resignation to Nehru.
Questions related to this were discussed between the two during their meetings with Mahatma Gandhi on 23 January and 30 January, just before the assassination. On both occasions, Mahatma Gandhi had stopped Sardar from resigning. It was decided that Nehru would also sit together the next day during their meeting on 30 January. But destiny did not provide an opportunity for this.
But then why did Patel not send his resignation?
Jayaprakash Narayan, who demanded Sardar’s resignation after Mahatma Gandhi’s assassination, was close to Nehru and was living with him in those days. Mridula Sarabhai was also close to Nehru. Patel understood that Jayaprakash Narayan was sharing Nehru’s thoughts about him and giving voice to it. Even after this second letter of Patel’s resignation was written, it was not sent to Nehru.
Patel’s personal assistant, Vidya Shankar, tried to convince him that destiny had decided this. The Home Ministry cannot be blamed for this. This letter of resignation will give Sardar’s opponents the freedom to act arbitrarily. The country will be deprived of the joint leadership of Nehru and Sardar, which is badly needed at this time. At this point, both Patel and Vidyashankar were failing to understand Nehru. Nehru’s letter of the same day was saying something else.
Nehru wrote that everything changed with Bapu’s death
On the same day when the news of the demand for Patel’s resignation appeared in the newspapers, on 3 February 1948, Nehru wrote to Patel, “Everything has changed with Bapu’s death. We have to face a changed and more difficult world. I am distressed by the whispers and rumours exaggerating the differences between you and me. We have to stop such mischief. In the 25 years we have been together, we have faced many crises and storms. I am saying with all honesty that during this time my affection and respect for you have constantly increased, and it cannot decrease under any circumstances.”
Nehru further wrote that after Bapu, it is my responsibility as well as yours to face crises and challenges together with full loyalty and honesty, not just superficially but with mutual trust as friends and allies. I had thought of a long conversation with you, but now I do not want to wait for it. This letter is a message of my love and friendship towards you.
Patel said we fought together for freedom and will stay together
Patel’s reply to Nehru on 5 February 1948 was giving news of the return of warmth between the two. But a day before that, on 4 February, in a meeting of the Congress in the Constituent Assembly, Patel, for the first time, addressed and accepted Nehru as “My Leader,” demonstrating his loyalty and solidarity towards his leadership. In his speech on this occasion, Patel said, “I am with the Prime Minister on every question of national interest. We have sat together at the feet of our guru Mahatma Gandhi for 25 years.
We have fought together for freedom. It cannot even be imagined that when the Mahatma is not among us today, we will fight among ourselves.” In his letter dated 5 February, Patel wrote about Nehru’s letter dated 3 February that the love and warmth expressed in it touched his heart. We have been together all our lives for the benefit of the country. My meeting with Bapu just before his death and his thoughts also connect us. I assure you that I will carry out my responsibilities with the same spirit.
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
